Comments on: intoDNS developement http://www.intodns.com/blog/index.php/2007/12/13/intodns-developement/ Just another WordPress weblog Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:53:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: [d] http://www.intodns.com/blog/index.php/2007/12/13/intodns-developement/comment-page-1/#comment-439 [d] Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:53:03 +0000 http://www.intodns.com/blog/index.php/2007/12/13/intodns-developement/#comment-439 When are you planning on supporting ipv6 name servers? That would be a very forward-looking feature! When are you planning on supporting ipv6 name servers? That would be a very forward-looking feature!

]]> By: Scott http://www.intodns.com/blog/index.php/2007/12/13/intodns-developement/comment-page-1/#comment-358 Scott Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:56:44 +0000 http://www.intodns.com/blog/index.php/2007/12/13/intodns-developement/#comment-358 What is the check that you do for glue records. It seems to fail for most sites, saying glue was not sent. I have looked over this many times, my zones do in fact gave glue. Is there perhaps a bug in the way you are checking glue records? There was a discussion on the isc bind mailing list a few weeks back, and we all looked over multiple zones, to conclude, the test is incorrect. I would also like to suggest, when there are errors, perhaps I could supply you with some different text. For example, I just bumped my SOA, and the secondary has not picked up on it yet. The error is understood, but it may be nice to say: Looks like your nameservers do not agree on the SOA serial. Ths SOA records as reported by your nameservers: xx.xx.xx.xx -> 2009101600 xx.xx.xx.yy -> 2009102000 If you just made an edit to your zone, this is normal. If you have not made any edits to your zone, this should be fixed immediately. Thanks What is the check that you do for glue records. It seems to fail for most sites, saying glue was not sent. I have looked over this many times, my zones do in fact gave glue. Is there perhaps a bug in the way you are checking glue records?

There was a discussion on the isc bind mailing list a few weeks back, and we all looked over multiple zones, to conclude, the test is incorrect.

I would also like to suggest, when there are errors, perhaps I could supply you with some different text. For example, I just bumped my SOA, and the secondary has not picked up on it yet. The error is understood, but it may be nice to say:

Looks like your nameservers do not agree on the SOA serial. Ths SOA records as reported by your nameservers:
xx.xx.xx.xx -> 2009101600
xx.xx.xx.yy -> 2009102000

If you just made an edit to your zone, this is normal. If you have not made any edits to your zone, this should be fixed immediately.

Thanks

]]>